The Double Bridle: An Instrument of Understanding...

Two of the most influential nations in dressage want to make them "optional" because the general public views them as being harmful. This is especially relevant in the lead-up to the 2024 Olympics, when dressage is expected to once again attract a large television audience. On the other hand, other parties involved have taken action to put an end to the debate by claiming that this "goodwill gesture" to the social license lobby is the result of misunderstandings. They continue by saying that dressage should not be singled out in comparison to the other disciplines.

The double bridle allows the rider to refine his communication with the horse and increase the precision of his aids. It literally "lies in the hands" of the rider, as the mobility and dexterity of the hands result from a correct seat and fine feeling.

Similarly, spurs allow the rider to provide refined and subtle leg aids. Moreover, significant welfare measures are currently in place.

Although it may be tempting to make these items optional as a 'peace offering' to critics in the hopes that they will be satisfied, this is a flawed and naive strategy. …. It would diminish the FEI's credibility as an organization based on evidence and principles.

The ability to train and use a double bridle has traditionally been regarded as a sign of expertise, and riders at the highest level of competition are judged on the accuracy of the contact. The snaffle and double bridles function differently. The acceptance of the double bridle cannot be assessed unless the horse is wearing one. The debate must be whether this criterion is still relevant or necessary.

In the meantime, leading dressage nations have proposed new regulations that restrict the use of double bridles and spurs. Consultation documents indicate that the FEI will not implement these suggestions this year, but that all tack will undergo a comprehensive review in 2023.

The Netherlands wants snaffle bridles to be optional for all CDI/CDIO3*/4*/5*/U25, CDI-Ws, Championships, and Olympic Games "within the framework of horse welfare and based on good experiences and best practices within several national federations." Where the double bridle continues to be used, the curb chain must have a leather, rubber, or sheepskin cover, whereas a cover is currently optional.

Britain proposed making spurs optional and allowing them to be made from non-brittle synthetics in addition to metal. It stated, "With some high-profile welfare issues raised at the Tokyo Olympics, where our sports are viewed by a non-equestrian audience, some view spur use as a negative aid. As equine welfare is now of the utmost importance, it may seem contradictory to mandate spur use in the rules."